Emma Roe
Impact in
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Geography, Planning and Development top 0.5%
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
Papers in
- Genetics 17
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 16
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions 17
- Co-authors
- Beth Greenhough (11 shared papers)Henry Buller (6 shared papers)B.B. Bock (2 shared papers)Isabelle Veissier (1 shared paper)Andrew Butterworth (1 shared paper)Kristen K. Reyher (5 shared papers)Helen R. Whay (2 shared papers)Anne M. Haase (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Medicine (4 papers)Environment and Planning D Society and Space (3 papers)Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (3 papers)Animal Welfare (3 papers)Animals (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Emma Roe
45 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Small Animals 442
- Geography, Planning and Development 340
- Speech and Hearing 89
- Genetics 355
- Agronomy and Crop Science 133
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Roe
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Roe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Roe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Roe. The network helps show where Emma Roe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Roe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 198 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 109 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 102 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 84 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 66 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 64 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 45 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 32 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 14 |
About Emma Roe
Emma Roe is a scholar working on Genetics, Geography, Planning and Development, Small Animals, Food Science and Ecology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (17 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (16 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers) and Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (442 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (340 citations), Speech and Hearing (89 citations), Genetics (355 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (133 citations). Emma Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Beth Greenhough, Henry Buller, B.B. Bock, Isabelle Veissier, Andrew Butterworth, Kristen K. Reyher, Helen R. Whay, Anne M. Haase, Alison Bard and David Main. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medicine, Environment and Planning D Society and Space, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space, Animal Welfare and Animals.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.