Emma Reble

413 citations
9 papers · 75 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Genomics and Rare Diseases 6
    • BRCA gene mutations in cancer 4
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 2
    • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 2
    • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases 1
    • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 3

Emma Reble

7 papers receiving 75 citations

Peers

Emma Reble
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Biological Psychiatry 4
  • Cancer Research 19
  • Genetics 35
  • Aging 2
  • Molecular Biology 31
Replace Aina Jené with:
Aina Jené Spain
Kimberly Foss United States
Catrina M. Loucks Canada
Nella Junna Finland
Giulia Salvadori Italy
Daniela Russo Italy
Meghan Acres United Kingdom
Alex Hastie United States
Xianxin Li China
Simone Heidemann Germany
Emma Reble relative to Aina Jené Spain Aina Jené's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Aina Jené · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Reble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Reble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Reble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Reble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Reble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Reble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Reble. The network helps show where Emma Reble may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Reble, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Reble Line = papers co-authored together Emma Reble links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201728
2 201719
3 202011
4 20217
5 20194
6 20214
7 20222
8 20230
9 20230

About Emma Reble

Emma Reble is a scholar working on Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cancer Research, having authored 9 papers that have together received 75 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Rare Diseases (6 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (4 citations), Cancer Research (19 citations), Genetics (35 citations), Aging (2 citations) and Molecular Biology (31 citations). Emma Reble has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cathy L. Barr, Shiva M. Singh, Christina A. Castellani, Melkaye G. Melka, Richard O’Reilly, Salma Shickh, Raymond H. Kim, Jordan Lerner‐Ellis, Yvonne Bombard and Chloe Mighton. Their work appears in journals such as Genes Brain & Behavior, European Journal of Human Genetics, Psychiatric Genetics, Genetics in Medicine and European Journal of Medical Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact