Emma Plugge

3.2k citations
100 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Plugge

96 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Emma Plugge
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Clinical Psychology 525
  • General Health Professions 435
  • Health 125
  • Sociology and Political Science 731
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 400
Replace Heather Sipsma with:
Heather Sipsma United States
Anette Agardh Sweden
Cathrine Fowler Australia
Saba W. Masho United States
Héctor Balcázar United States
Tazeen Saeed Ali Pakistan
Sônia Silva Marcon Brazil
David Teye Doku Ghana
Charles Opondo United Kingdom
Marielena Lara United States
Emma Plugge relative to Heather Sipsma United States Heather Sipsma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Heather Sipsma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Plugge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Plugge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Plugge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Plugge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Plugge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Plugge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Plugge. The network helps show where Emma Plugge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Plugge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Plugge Line = papers co-authored together Emma Plugge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012168
2 2016147
3 2012147
4 2016143
5 200986
6 202167
7 201867
8 200563
9 201861
10
The Health of Women in Prison Study Findings
200656
11 201055
12 201654
13 200952
14 201545
15 200844
16 200544
17 201842
18 200937
19 201137
20 200935

About Emma Plugge

Emma Plugge is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 100 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (37 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers) and Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (525 citations), General Health Professions (435 citations), Health (125 citations), Sociology and Political Science (731 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (400 citations). Emma Plugge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Thailand and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ray Fitzpatrick, Nicola Douglas, Marian Knight, Gracia Fellmeth, Mina Fazel, Éamonn O’Moore, Helen Doll, Katharine Herbert, P Yudkin and François Nosten. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, PLoS ONE, The Lancet Public Health and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact