Emma McLaughlin

731 citations
28 papers · 468 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Emma McLaughlin

25 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Emma McLaughlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Speech and Hearing 61
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 102
  • Pharmacy 13
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 33
  • Emergency Medical Services 15
Replace H. Davies with:
H. Davies United Kingdom
Lisa McCall Australia
Jennifer O. Farnum United States
Irene Forsman United States
O’Connor United States
Wendy Anderson United Kingdom
Ellen J. Thompson United Kingdom
Izabela Krupska United States
Jane M. DeLuca United States
Amy Hunter United Kingdom
Emma McLaughlin relative to H. Davies United Kingdom H. Davies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
H. Davies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma McLaughlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma McLaughlin. The network helps show where Emma McLaughlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma McLaughlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma McLaughlin Line = papers co-authored together Emma McLaughlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200770
2 202154
3 201248
4 200842
5 202041
6 201739
7 202133
8 202120
9 201719
10 202218
11 201013
12 200713
13 202311
14 202211
15 20187
16 20196
17 20244
18 20194
19 20194
20 20243

About Emma McLaughlin

Emma McLaughlin is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Literature and Literary Theory, Oncology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (5 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (61 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (102 citations), Pharmacy (13 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (33 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (15 citations). Emma McLaughlin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Adamson, Michelle Lincoln, S. Nicole Culos‐Reed, Amanda Wurz, Nora Shields, Jean Parkinson, Robbie A. McDonald, Jim Provan, Gemma E. Beatty and Sarah Preston. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Translational Behavioral Medicine, The Surgeon, Maturitas and Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact