Emma L. Sharp
Impact in
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
Papers in
-
- Organic Food and Agriculture 8
- Urban Agriculture and Sustainability 5
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions 8
- Co-authors
- Helen E. Farrell (3 shared papers)Nicholas Davis‐Poynter (3 shared papers)Nicholas E. Leadbeater (3 shared papers)Mélanie Kah (6 shared papers)Jennifer Salmond (2 shared papers)Tau Benned‐Jensen (1 shared paper)Mette M. Rosenkilde (1 shared paper)Stefan Bräse (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- New Zealand Geographer (6 papers)Sustainability (2 papers)Journal of General Virology (2 papers)Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2 papers)Asia Pacific Viewpoint (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma L. Sharp
40 papers receiving 416 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Geography, Planning and Development 50
- Equine 5
- Food Science 48
- Epidemiology 77
- Agronomy and Crop Science 25
Countries citing papers authored by Emma L. Sharp
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma L. Sharp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma L. Sharp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma L. Sharp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma L. Sharp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma L. Sharp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma L. Sharp. The network helps show where Emma L. Sharp may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma L. Sharp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 47 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 10 |
About Emma L. Sharp
Emma L. Sharp is a scholar working on Plant Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Food Science, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Food and Agriculture (8 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (8 papers), Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (5 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (4 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (3 papers) and Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (50 citations), Equine (5 citations), Food Science (48 citations), Epidemiology (77 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (25 citations). Emma L. Sharp has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helen E. Farrell, Nicholas Davis‐Poynter, Nicholas E. Leadbeater, Mélanie Kah, Jennifer Salmond, Tau Benned‐Jensen, Mette M. Rosenkilde, Stefan Bräse, Frank Lauterwasser and Stefan Dahmen. Their work appears in journals such as New Zealand Geographer, Sustainability, Journal of General Virology, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters and Asia Pacific Viewpoint.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.