Emma L. Patchick
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Treatment
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Papers in
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 8
-
- Pain Management and Treatment 4
- Co-authors
- Fabrice Caillette (4 shared papers)Craig D. Murray (4 shared papers)Toby Howard (4 shared papers)Audrey Bowen (7 shared papers)Andy Vail (5 shared papers)Jai Kulkarni (2 shared papers)Anne Hesketh (4 shared papers)Caroline Leigh Watkins (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Rehabilitation (2 papers)Aphasiology (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)International Journal on Disability and Human Development (1 paper)Disability and Rehabilitation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emma L. Patchick
13 papers receiving 513 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 138
- Rehabilitation 135
- Human-Computer Interaction 47
- Cognitive Neuroscience 132
- Pharmacology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Emma L. Patchick
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma L. Patchick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma L. Patchick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma L. Patchick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma L. Patchick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma L. Patchick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma L. Patchick. The network helps show where Emma L. Patchick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Emma L. Patchick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 188 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 136 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 12 | Attention control within the ACTNoW randomized controlled trial:: getting it right? | 2010 | 1 |
| 13 | Enhanced aphasia or dysarthria therapy delivered in the first four months after stroke does not add more benefit than attention control: a randomised controlled trial | 2012 | 1 |
About Emma L. Patchick
Emma L. Patchick is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (1 paper), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (138 citations), Rehabilitation (135 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (47 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (132 citations) and Pharmacology (87 citations). Emma L. Patchick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fabrice Caillette, Craig D. Murray, Toby Howard, Audrey Bowen, Andy Vail, Jai Kulkarni, Anne Hesketh, Caroline Leigh Watkins, Linda Mary Davies and Gill Pearl. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Rehabilitation, Aphasiology, BMJ, International Journal on Disability and Human Development and Disability and Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.