Emma E. Boxer
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 5
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 1
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 1
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 1
- Co-authors
- Jason Aoto (6 shared papers)Nicole L. Garneau (1 shared paper)Christopher Ford (2 shared papers)Yuan Cai (1 shared paper)K. Ulrich Bayer (1 shared paper)Steven J. Coultrap (1 shared paper)Nicole L. Rumian (1 shared paper)Howard Schulman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuron (2 papers)SpringerPlus (1 paper)Cell Reports (1 paper)Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Emma E. Boxer
7 papers receiving 223 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 111
- Sensory Systems 27
- Developmental Neuroscience 11
- Aging 5
- Nutrition and Dietetics 31
Countries citing papers authored by Emma E. Boxer
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma E. Boxer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma E. Boxer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma E. Boxer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma E. Boxer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma E. Boxer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma E. Boxer. The network helps show where Emma E. Boxer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Emma E. Boxer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 6 |
About Emma E. Boxer
Emma E. Boxer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Sensory Systems, having authored 7 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (1 paper), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (111 citations), Sensory Systems (27 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (11 citations), Aging (5 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (31 citations). Emma E. Boxer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jason Aoto, Nicole L. Garneau, Christopher Ford, Yuan Cai, K. Ulrich Bayer, Steven J. Coultrap, Nicole L. Rumian, Howard Schulman, Ronald K. Freund and Carolyn Nicole Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, SpringerPlus, Cell Reports, Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.