Emma C. Smith

1.6k citations
17 papers · 289 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Emma C. Smith

17 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Emma C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Atmospheric Science 188
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 83
  • Geophysics 43
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 80
  • Applied Psychology 10
Replace Anne Søndergaard with:
Anne Søndergaard Denmark
Melissa Ward Jones United States
Anne-Marie Nuttall United Kingdom
Christine H Scott United Kingdom
Allison L. Smith United States
Lorraine Copeland United Kingdom
Rozina Naz Pakistan
Qingqing Yang China
William A. White United States
Fernando Diez Caballero Spain
Emma C. Smith relative to Anne Søndergaard Denmark Anne Søndergaard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Anne Søndergaard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma C. Smith. The network helps show where Emma C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Emma C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201753
2 201542
3 200338
4 201634
5 200527
6 202021
7 202019
8 201913
9 202010
10 20218
11 20218
12 20225
13 20243
14 20223
15 20242
16 20222
17
Behind the Subduction Zone: Seismic Wave Speeds in the Upper Mantle Wedge Beneath the Central North Island, New Zealand
20061

About Emma C. Smith

Emma C. Smith is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Geophysics and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cryospheric studies and observations (10 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (7 papers), Landslides and related hazards (6 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (3 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (2 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (2 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (188 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (83 citations), Geophysics (43 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (80 citations) and Applied Psychology (10 citations). Emma C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Grawe, Alex Mark Brisbourne, Andrew M. Smith, Robert Stephen White, Carlos Martín, Hamish D. Pritchard, John Michael Kendall, Alan F. Baird, Olaf Eisen and Wilfried Jokat. Their work appears in journals such as Geophysical Research Letters, ˜The œcryosphere, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Annals of Glaciology and Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact