Daniel Shapero

438 citations
13 papers · 210 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Shapero

12 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers

Daniel Shapero
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Atmospheric Science 188
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 66
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 91
  • Oceanography 11
  • Geophysics 7
Replace Irena Vaňková with:
Irena Vaňková United States
A. Boghosian United States
Dorothée Vallot Sweden
Julian J. Spergel United States
Lukas Krieger Germany
Aqsa Patel United States
Ryan Cassotto United States
A. Sargent United States
Anja Wendt Germany
Daniel Shapero relative to Irena Vaňková United States Irena Vaňková's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Irena Vaňková · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Shapero

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Shapero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Shapero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Shapero more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Shapero

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Shapero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Shapero. The network helps show where Daniel Shapero may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Shapero, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Shapero Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Shapero links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 202173
2 201648
3 202120
4 202118
5 202017
6 202111
7 20209
8 20244
9 20244
10 20203
11 20192
12 20241
13 20250

About Daniel Shapero

Daniel Shapero is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cryospheric studies and observations (10 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (5 papers), Landslides and related hazards (4 papers), Climate change and permafrost (3 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (3 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (2 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (1 paper) and Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (188 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (66 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (91 citations), Oceanography (11 citations) and Geophysics (7 citations). Daniel Shapero has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ian Joughin, Pierre Dutrieux, Ben Smith, Fabien Gillet‐Chaulet, Kristin Poinar, Andrew O. Hoffman, Mathieu Morlighem, Knut Christianson, B. E. Smith and Robert C. Kirby. Their work appears in journals such as Geoscientific model development, ˜The œcryosphere, Science Advances, Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface and Numerische Mathematik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact