Emily Wright

15 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Emily Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Clinical Psychology 138
  • Safety Research 38
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
  • Social Psychology 79
  • Hematology 39
Replace Mary McElroy with:
Mary McElroy United States
Scott B. Greenspan United States
Ellen O’Donnell United States
Rachel Colla Australia
Zi Jia Ng United States
Göran Patriksson Sweden
Tricia Orzeck Canada
María Fernández-Cabezas Spain
Michelle Wilson United Kingdom
Elizabeth Partington United Kingdom
Emily Wright relative to Mary McElroy United States Mary McElroy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Mary McElroy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Wright. The network helps show where Emily Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Wright Line = papers co-authored together Emily Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2007119
2 199583
3 202157
4
1 Achieving Accurate Pictures of Risk and Identifying Gender Responsive Needs: Two New Assessments for Women Offenders1
201531
5 201328
6 200820
7 202311
8 201910
9 20186
10 20186
11 20196
12 20205
13 20232
14 20192
15 20211

About Emily Wright

Emily Wright is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (7 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (4 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (4 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (2 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (1 paper), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (138 citations), Safety Research (38 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (51 citations), Social Psychology (79 citations) and Hematology (39 citations). Emily Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and India. Frequent co-authors include Emily J. Salisbury, Patricia Van Voorhis, E C Theil, Jean‐François Briat, D. E. Sayers, Sam Elliott, Camilla J. Knight, Sam N. Thrower, Travis E. Dorsch and Ashley Bauman. Their work appears in journals such as Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Psychology of sport and exercise, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, The Sport Psychologist and International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact