Emily Stone

2.1k citations
66 papers · 1.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Stone

60 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Emily Stone's Hit Papers

Lung cancer screening 2022 · 250 citations
2500+1+2Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Emily Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Molecular Medicine 71
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 255
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 263
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 16
  • Oncology 157
Replace Eduardo Savio with:
Eduardo Savio Uruguay
Stephen J. Kim United States
Dodge L. Baluya United States
Nengming Lin China
Mehdi Azad Iran
Jacek Szeliga Poland
Ilan G. Ron Israel
Rola Jaafar Lebanon
Bryan Smith United States
Wararat Chiangjong Thailand
Emily Stone relative to Eduardo Savio Uruguay Eduardo Savio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Eduardo Savio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Stone. The network helps show where Emily Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Stone Line = papers co-authored together Emily Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Lung cancer screening
Hit paper breakdown →
2022250
2 2003136
3 2011110
4 201954
5 201852
6 201851
7 200650
8 201937
9 200437
10 201634
11 201732
12 201822
13 202218
14 201918
15 201414
16 201614
17 202212
18 202212
19 201812
20 201910

About Emily Stone

Emily Stone is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (18 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (12 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (9 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (6 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (71 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (255 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (263 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (16 citations) and Oncology (157 citations). Emily Stone has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Florian J. Fintelmann, Scott Adams, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, David Baldwin, Pyng Lee, Nicole Rankin, C. Roger MacKenzie, Jianbing Zhang, Craig Lewis and Tomoko Hirama. Their work appears in journals such as Respirology, Translational Lung Cancer Research, Journal of Thoracic Oncology, PLoS ONE and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact