Emily Sightes

16 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Emily Sightes
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 141
  • Clinical Psychology 58
  • Emergency Medicine 21
  • Epidemiology 78
  • General Health Professions 57
Replace Grant Victor with:
Grant Victor United States
Amanda Butler Canada
Rebecca Foster United Kingdom
Sheila P. Vakharia United States
Martha Tillson United States
Laurel Challacombe Canada
Redonna Chandler United States
Peter Treitler United States
Jenna Valleriani Canada
Tenie Khachikian United States
Emily Sightes relative to Grant Victor United States Grant Victor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Grant Victor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Sightes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Sightes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Sightes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Sightes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Sightes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Sightes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Sightes. The network helps show where Emily Sightes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Sightes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Sightes Line = papers co-authored together Emily Sightes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202152
2 201849
3 201938
4 201836
5 202134
6 202134
7 202125
8 202023
9 202117
10 202116
11 201912
12 20235
13 20223
14 20213
15 20203
16
Replication of an emergency department-based recovery coaching intervention and pilot testing of pragmatic trial protocols within the context of Indiana's Opioid State Targeted Response plan
20192

About Emily Sightes

Emily Sightes is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (6 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (141 citations), Clinical Psychology (58 citations), Emergency Medicine (21 citations), Epidemiology (78 citations) and General Health Professions (57 citations). Emily Sightes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bradley Ray, Katie Bailey, Philip Huynh, Dennis P. Watson, Evan M. Lowder, Grant Victor, Jeremiah Goulka, Brandon del Pozo, Leo Beletsky and Eric Grommon. Their work appears in journals such as Harm Reduction Journal, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Health & Justice, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Journal of Correctional Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact