Emily Sightes

16 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Emily Sightes
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 190
  • Emergency Medicine 55
  • Toxicology 19
  • Epidemiology 172
  • General Health Professions 96
Replace Frishta Nafeh with:
Frishta Nafeh Canada
Grant Victor United States
Sasha Mital United States
Anne Siegler United States
Sheila P. Vakharia United States
Rebecca Bolinski United States
Abenaa Jones United States
Matthew Bonn Canada
Shelley Cogger Australia
Laura B. Monico United States
Emily Sightes relative to Frishta Nafeh Canada Frishta Nafeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Frishta Nafeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Sightes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Sightes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Sightes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Sightes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Sightes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Sightes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Sightes. The network helps show where Emily Sightes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Emily Sightes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Sightes Line = papers co-authored together Emily Sightes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202148
2 201845
3 201937
4 201836
5 202133
6 202131
7 202022
8 202121
9 202116
10 202116
11 201911
12 20213
13 20233
14 20203
15 20222
16
Replication of an emergency department-based recovery coaching intervention and pilot testing of pragmatic trial protocols within the context of Indiana's Opioid State Targeted Response plan
20192

About Emily Sightes

Emily Sightes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (190 citations), Emergency Medicine (55 citations), Toxicology (19 citations), Epidemiology (172 citations) and General Health Professions (96 citations). Emily Sightes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bradley Ray, Philip Huynh, Dennis P. Watson, Evan M. Lowder, Grant Victor, Brandon del Pozo, Jeremiah Goulka, Leo Beletsky, Eric Grommon and Daniel O’Donnell. Their work appears in journals such as Harm Reduction Journal, Health & Justice, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment and Journal of Experimental Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact