Emily Michael

1.1k citations
19 papers · 440 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 3
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 2
    • Augustinian Studies and Theology 2
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 1
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 1
    • Historical Philosophy and Science 5

Emily Michael

15 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Emily Michael
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 266
  • History and Philosophy of Science 56
  • Philosophy 74
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Clinical Psychology 86
Replace Raphael van Riel with:
Raphael van Riel Germany
Jacqueline Feldman United States
Juan D. Molina Spain
Baerbel Allingham United States
G. Eberhard Nyman Sweden
José Luis Gutiérrez Spain
M. Jackuelyn Harris United States
R. Marcus Germany
C.G.G. Link United Kingdom
Mark D. Watanabe United States
Emily Michael relative to Raphael van Riel Germany Raphael van Riel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Raphael van Riel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Michael

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Michael's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Michael with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Michael more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Michael

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Michael. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Michael. The network helps show where Emily Michael may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Emily Michael, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Michael Line = papers co-authored together Emily Michael links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2008307
2 198564
3 202113
4 199713
5 19897
6 19847
7 19906
8 19896
9 19925
10 19753
11 19883
12 20033
13 19951
14 19901
15 19791
16 19900
17 19900
18 19770
19 19890

About Emily Michael

Emily Michael is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, History and Molecular Biology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (5 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (266 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (56 citations), Philosophy (74 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations) and Clinical Psychology (86 citations). Emily Michael has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Anderson, Jean A. Frazier, Louise Ritz, Ann E. Maloney, Robert L. Findling, Nora McNamara, Benedetto Vitiello, Jeffrey A. Lieberman, Stefanie A. Hlastala and S. de Jong. Their work appears in journals such as History of European Ideas, Journal of the History of Ideas, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, American Journal of Psychiatry and Notes and Queries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact