Emily Marks
Impact in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health top 10%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Papers in
- Oncology 3
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 2
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 1
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 2
- Co-authors
- Simon J. Craddock Lee (10 shared papers)Robin T. Higashi (5 shared papers)Jamie S. Ostroff (2 shared papers)Joan H. Schiller (1 shared paper)David E. Gerber (1 shared paper)Heidi Hamann (1 shared paper)Una E. Makris (2 shared papers)M. Carrington Reid (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (2 papers)Patient Education and Counseling (2 papers)Pain Medicine (1 paper)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (1 paper)Preventive Medicine Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanCanada
In The Last Decade
Emily Marks
17 papers receiving 499 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 26
- Health 84
- Applied Psychology 20
- Oncology 86
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 15
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Marks
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Marks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Marks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Marks. The network helps show where Emily Marks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 127 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 |
About Emily Marks
Emily Marks is a scholar working on Oncology, Pharmacology, Health, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 18 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper), HIV-related health complications and treatments (1 paper) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (26 citations), Health (84 citations), Applied Psychology (20 citations), Oncology (86 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (15 citations). Emily Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Simon J. Craddock Lee, Robin T. Higashi, Jamie S. Ostroff, Joan H. Schiller, David E. Gerber, Heidi Hamann, Una E. Makris, M. Carrington Reid, Thomas M. Gill and Liana Fraenkel. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Patient Education and Counseling, Pain Medicine, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Preventive Medicine Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.