Emily Ginier

15 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

Emily Ginier
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 85
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 25
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 23
  • Library and Information Sciences 7
  • General Health Professions 63
Replace Carl R Hinkson with:
Carl R Hinkson United States
M.J. Frade Mera Spain
Gian Domenico Giusti Italy
France Clarke Canada
Dan R. Thompson United States
Harriet Shannon United Kingdom
Joke Wielenga Netherlands
Beverley Ewens Australia
Amy Freeman–Sanderson Australia
Paul Greig United Kingdom
Emily Ginier relative to Carl R Hinkson United States Carl R Hinkson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Carl R Hinkson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Ginier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Ginier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Ginier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Ginier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Ginier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Ginier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Ginier. The network helps show where Emily Ginier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Ginier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Ginier Line = papers co-authored together Emily Ginier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2017123
2 202037
3 201933
4 201722
5 202121
6 202019
7 202114
8 202113
9 20199
10 20219
11 20208
12 20196
13 20136
14 20203
15
Integrated "5S" Levels of Organization of Evidence Pyramid
20171

About Emily Ginier

Emily Ginier is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Speech and Hearing, having authored 15 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Social Media in Health Education (1 paper) and Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (85 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (25 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (23 citations), Library and Information Sciences (7 citations) and General Health Professions (63 citations). Emily Ginier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Anne Sales, Theodore J. Iwashyna, Sushant Govindan, Deena Kelly Costa, Matthew White, Milisa Manojlovich, Shawna L Strickland, Barbara L. Brush, Elizabeth Burgess Dowdell and Ulrich Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Respiratory Care, Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA, CHEST Journal, The Journal of School Nursing and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact