Emily Forbat

562 citations
21 papers · 393 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Dermatologic Treatments and Research
    • Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
    • Skin Protection and Aging
    • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Virology top 10%
    • Poxvirus research and outbreaks

Papers in

Emily Forbat

19 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Emily Forbat
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Dermatology 222
  • Virology 37
  • Cultural Studies 33
  • Cell Biology 37
  • Urology 11
Replace Ramya Vangipuram with:
Ramya Vangipuram United States
John Z. S. Chen United States
R. Lindskov Denmark
Enayat Attwa Egypt
Marshall A. Guill United States
Farah Moustafa United States
A. J. Kanwar India
Esen Özkaya‐Bayazit Türkiye
Michela Troiano Italy
Wendy W. Lou United States
Emily Forbat relative to Ramya Vangipuram United States Ramya Vangipuram's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
Ramya Vangipuram · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Forbat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Forbat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Forbat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Forbat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Forbat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Forbat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Forbat. The network helps show where Emily Forbat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Emily Forbat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Forbat Line = papers co-authored together Emily Forbat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201767
2 201749
3 201631
4 201929
5 201729
6 202127
7 201825
8 201822
9 201622
10 201921
11 201617
12 201715
13 201611
14 20189
15 20188
16 20216
17 20242
18 20172
19 20201
20 20160

About Emily Forbat

Emily Forbat is a scholar working on Dermatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Immunology and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dermatologic Treatments and Research (10 papers), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (6 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (4 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (2 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (2 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (2 papers) and Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (222 citations), Virology (37 citations), Cultural Studies (33 citations), Cell Biology (37 citations) and Urology (11 citations). Emily Forbat has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Firas Al‐Niaimi, Faisal R. Ali, Simon Tso, Harpal Randeva, A. Ilchyshyn, Richard Barlow, Yuting Tan, Thomas M. Barber, R. Mallipeddi and Abraham Botha. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Contact Dermatitis and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact