Emily E. Stevens

485 citations
11 papers · 334 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Emily E. Stevens

11 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Emily E. Stevens
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 74
  • Epidemiology 113
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 30
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 34
  • Paleontology 14
Replace Marie Bournez with:
Marie Bournez France
Ying‐Chin Wu Taiwan
А. И. Козлов Russia
J. Ghesquiêre Belgium
Sharon M. Young United States
Yolanda Gutiérrez Spain
Iwona Rosset Poland
Alice Germa France
Anita Gupta India
David M. Glassman United States
Emily E. Stevens relative to Marie Bournez France Marie Bournez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Marie Bournez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Stevens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Stevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Stevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Stevens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Stevens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Stevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Stevens. The network helps show where Emily E. Stevens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Stevens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Stevens Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Stevens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2009244
2 201050
3 201417
4 199411
5 20143
6
PRETERM INFANT FEEDING AND CARDIORESPIRATORY STABILITY
20072
7
A newly proposed semi-automated method of grading invasive lobular carcinoma: a unifying concept and correlation with prognostic markers and patient survival.
20092
8 20152
9 19811
10 20121
11 20151

About Emily E. Stevens

Emily E. Stevens is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Cancer Research and Neurology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (1 paper), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (1 paper), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (1 paper), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (1 paper), Infant Nutrition and Health (1 paper) and Ethics in medical practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (74 citations), Epidemiology (113 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (30 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (34 citations) and Paleontology (14 citations). Emily E. Stevens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rita H. Pickler, Thelma E. Patrick, Elizabeth A. Gazza, Andrew Smolen, Kenneth Blum, Bernard William Downs, David K. Miller, Abdalla Bowirrat, Paul F. Shanley and Connie J. Beehler. Their work appears in journals such as Clinics in Dermatology, Pediatric Research, Journal of Applied Physiology, Postgraduate Medicine and Advances in Neonatal Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact