Emily E. Shaw

9 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

Emily E. Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 166
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 160
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 81
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 59
Replace Lindsey A. Leigland with:
Lindsey A. Leigland United States
Bradford Dickerson United States
Caroline Malherbe Germany
David K. Powell United States
Jin-Ju Yang South Korea
Abderazzak Mouiha Canada
Mark Postans United Kingdom
Raquel Yubero Spain
Erin Gibson Canada
Barbara Vogt Germany
Emily E. Shaw relative to Lindsey A. Leigland United States Lindsey A. Leigland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Lindsey A. Leigland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Shaw. The network helps show where Emily E. Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2015168
2 201573
3 201468
4 201759
5 201327
6 201327
7
Moderate Intensity Exercise in Pre-manifest Huntington's Disease: Results of a 6 months Trial.
20212
8 20182
9 20121

About Emily E. Shaw

Emily E. Shaw is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (166 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (160 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (81 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (59 citations). Emily E. Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Aaron P. Schultz, Reisa Anne Sperling, Trey Hedden, Emily Joy Rogalski, Jane S. Paulsen, Sandra Weıntraub, Amanda C. Miller, ALFRED W. RADEMAKER, Adam Martersteck and M.‐Marsel Mesulam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Brain Connectivity, Behavioural Neurology, Handbook of clinical neurology and Alzheimer s & Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact