Emily E. Mevers

1.6k citations
44 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Emily E. Mevers

41 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Emily E. Mevers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Pharmacology 542
  • Biotechnology 132
  • Spectroscopy 175
  • Aquatic Science 45
  • Environmental Chemistry 55
Replace Benjamin R. Clark with:
Benjamin R. Clark China
Ashootosh Tripathi United States
Alessandra S. Eustáquio United States
Nathan A. Moss United States
Christine Beemelmanns Germany
Jaclyn M. Winter United States
Christophe Corre United Kingdom
Thomas Luke Simmons United States
Takaaki Kubota Japan
Albán R. Pereira United States
Emily E. Mevers relative to Benjamin R. Clark China Benjamin R. Clark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Benjamin R. Clark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Mevers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Mevers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Mevers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Mevers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Mevers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Mevers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Mevers. The network helps show where Emily E. Mevers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Mevers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Mevers Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Mevers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010230
2 2017140
3 201699
4 201195
5 201884
6 201274
7 201970
8 201935
9 201834
10 202134
11 201233
12 201733
13 201833
14 201832
15 201327
16 201824
17 201824
18 201623
19 201422
20 202321

About Emily E. Mevers

Emily E. Mevers is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cancer Research, Environmental Engineering, Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (24 papers), Beetle Biology and Toxicology Studies (5 papers), Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation (4 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (3 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (3 papers), Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry (3 papers), Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (2 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (542 citations), Biotechnology (132 citations), Spectroscopy (175 citations), Aquatic Science (45 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (55 citations). Emily E. Mevers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and China. Frequent co-authors include William H. Gerwick, Joshawna K. Nunnery, Jon Clardy, Tara Byrum, Josep Saurí, Yizhou Liu, Gary E. Martin, Robert Thomas Williamson, Gleb Pishchany and Henk C. Hiemstra. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Organic Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, PLoS ONE and Journal of Chemical Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact