Emily E. Friedrich

26 papers receiving 824 citations

Peers

Emily E. Friedrich
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Pharmaceutical Science 108
  • Rehabilitation 103
  • Dermatology 95
  • Neurology 141
  • Physiology 178
Replace Jianhua Gao with:
Jianhua Gao China
Cyrus C. Rabbani United States
Tao Zan China
Fabrice Billet France
Tateki Kubo Japan
Lara A. Muffley United States
Herbert Tempfer Austria
Eun‐Sang Dhong South Korea
Changjiang Gu China
Rachel Sarabia-Estrada United States
Emily E. Friedrich relative to Jianhua Gao China Jianhua Gao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Jianhua Gao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Friedrich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Friedrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Friedrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Friedrich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Friedrich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Friedrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Friedrich. The network helps show where Emily E. Friedrich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Friedrich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Friedrich Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Friedrich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019203
2 2010100
3 201584
4 200884
5 201358
6 201249
7 201644
8 201640
9 201738
10 201734
11 201224
12 201620
13 202015
14 201311
15 201511
16 202010
17 20214
18 20232
19 20222
20 20102

About Emily E. Friedrich

Emily E. Friedrich is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Rehabilitation, Dermatology, Cell Biology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 26 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (6 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers) and Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (108 citations), Rehabilitation (103 citations), Dermatology (95 citations), Neurology (141 citations) and Physiology (178 citations). Emily E. Friedrich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Newell R. Washburn, Zhigang Hong, Asrar B. Malik, Ming Zhong, Anke Di, Yulia A. Komarova, Shiqin Xiong, Jalees Rehman, Ruth G. Perez and Chang‐Sook Hong. Their work appears in journals such as Wound Repair and Regeneration, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Laboratory Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact