Emily E. Friedrich

26 papers receiving 788 citations

Peers

Emily E. Friedrich
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Rehabilitation 100
  • Pharmaceutical Science 101
  • Dermatology 92
  • Neurology 138
  • Physiology 172
Replace Fabrice Billet with:
Fabrice Billet France
Jianhua Gao China
Cyrus C. Rabbani United States
Tao Zan China
Herbert Tempfer Austria
Eun‐Sang Dhong South Korea
Augustas Pivoriūnas Lithuania
Rachel Sarabia-Estrada United States
Dali Wang China
Pankaj Sharma India
Emily E. Friedrich relative to Fabrice Billet France Fabrice Billet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.1×
Fabrice Billet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Friedrich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Friedrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Friedrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Friedrich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Friedrich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Friedrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Friedrich. The network helps show where Emily E. Friedrich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Friedrich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Friedrich Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Friedrich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019193
2 201096
3 200882
4 201580
5 201357
6 201248
7 201640
8 201639
9 201733
10 201731
11 201223
12 201619
13 202014
14 201511
15 20139
16 20209
17 20214
18 20232
19 20222
20 20221

About Emily E. Friedrich

Emily E. Friedrich is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Molecular Biology, Rehabilitation, Cell Biology and Dermatology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 799 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (6 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (3 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers) and Hemostasis and retained surgical items (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (100 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (101 citations), Dermatology (92 citations), Neurology (138 citations) and Physiology (172 citations). Emily E. Friedrich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Newell R. Washburn, Zhigang Hong, Asrar B. Malik, Jalees Rehman, Yulia Komarova, Shiqin Xiong, Ming Zhong, Anke Di, Chang‐Sook Hong and Ruth G. Perez. Their work appears in journals such as Wound Repair and Regeneration, Biochemical Engineering Journal, Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact