Emily Dodd

20 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Emily Dodd
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 55
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 50
  • Social Psychology 57
  • Rehabilitation 14
Replace Hannah Rogers with:
Hannah Rogers United States
Minju Kim South Korea
Jane Stephens United Kingdom
Nosheen Zehra Pakistan
Golden Mwakibo Masika Tanzania
Olatunji F. Aina Nigeria
Elena Chover‐Sierra Spain
Eleni Karasouli United Kingdom
Jessica Y. Allen United States
Emily Dodd relative to Hannah Rogers United States Hannah Rogers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Hannah Rogers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Dodd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Dodd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Dodd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Dodd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Dodd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Dodd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Dodd. The network helps show where Emily Dodd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Dodd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Dodd Line = papers co-authored together Emily Dodd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201471
2 201843
3 201431
4 199317
5 201515
6 202014
7 202112
8 201811
9 201611
10 202110
11 201610
12 20179
13 20158
14 20175
15 20252
16 20202
17 20242
18 20202
19 20241
20 20201

About Emily Dodd

Emily Dodd is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper) and Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (55 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (50 citations), Social Psychology (57 citations) and Rehabilitation (14 citations). Emily Dodd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Richard Cheston, Melissa D. Halpern, Jacqueline M. McGrath, Sheila M. Gephart, Alan R. Spitzer, Judith A. Effken, Tim Wildschut, Gary Christopher, Constantine Sedikides and Richard Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Dementia, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, The International Journal of Aging and Human Development and Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact