Emily Dibble
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Library and Information Sciences top 10%
Papers in
-
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 2
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 2
- Co-authors
- David A. Hanauer (2 shared papers)Jennifer Fortin (2 shared papers)Nananda F. Col (2 shared papers)Sari M. van Anders (4 shared papers)Zach C. Schudson (3 shared papers)Long Ngo (1 shared paper)Eun‐Jung Kim (1 shared paper)Qing Zeng (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Medicine (2 papers)Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (1 paper)Journal of American College Health (1 paper)CHEST Journal (1 paper)Applied Cognitive Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Emily Dibble
15 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Gender Studies 55
- Library and Information Sciences 8
- General Health Professions 81
- Applied Psychology 14
- Health 20
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Dibble
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Dibble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Dibble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Dibble more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Dibble
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Dibble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Dibble. The network helps show where Emily Dibble may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Dibble, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 89 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 88 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 10 | Use of the Internet for seeking health care information among young adults. | 2003 | 3 |
| 11 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 16 | Torchlights in ESL: Five Community College Profiles. | 2007 | 0 |
About Emily Dibble
Emily Dibble is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (1 paper), Student Assessment and Feedback (1 paper), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (55 citations), Library and Information Sciences (8 citations), General Health Professions (81 citations), Applied Psychology (14 citations) and Health (20 citations). Emily Dibble has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David A. Hanauer, Jennifer Fortin, Nananda F. Col, Sari M. van Anders, Zach C. Schudson, Long Ngo, Eun‐Jung Kim, Qing Zeng, Robert M. Plovnick and Deborah McCutchen. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Journal of American College Health, CHEST Journal and Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.