Emily Davis

3.0k citations
24 papers · 840 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Davis

23 papers receiving 805 citations

Peers

Emily Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 401
  • Cell Biology 225
  • Plant Science 441
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 80
  • Pharmacology 61
Replace J. Hutchinson with:
J. Hutchinson United States
Chuan Xu China
Lawrence W. Smith United States
Alexandra Dinis Portugal
Megan Thomas United Kingdom
Letícia Casanova Mexico
Martin W. Schnell Germany
Jane M. Wilson Canada
Mary Piper United States
Lina Zhao China
Emily Davis relative to J. Hutchinson United States J. Hutchinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.4×
J. Hutchinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Davis. The network helps show where Emily Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Davis Line = papers co-authored together Emily Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006170
2 2008117
3 2003113
4 200867
5 201751
6 201744
7 201539
8 201536
9 200833
10 201833
11 201720
12 201820
13 200715
14 201914
15 201913
16 201712
17 200810
18 20198
19 20226
20 20205

About Emily Davis

Emily Davis is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 24 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bryophyte Studies and Records (5 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (3 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (401 citations), Cell Biology (225 citations), Plant Science (441 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (80 citations) and Pharmacology (61 citations). Emily Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include A. Jonathan Shaw, David G. Long, Barbara Crandall‐Stotler, Michelle L. Hollingsworth, Alexandra Clark, Joseph B. Franklin, Rytas Vilgalys, Laura L. Forrest, Mary Jane Rotheram‐Borus and Jana M. U’Ren. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Epilepsy & Behavior, AIDS and Behavior, The Bryologist and Annals of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact