Emily Baker

2.2k citations
66 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Baker

61 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Emily Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 812
  • Environmental Chemistry 461
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 175
  • Pollution 201
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 230
Replace Shohreh F. Farzan with:
Shohreh F. Farzan United States
Nina Iszatt Norway
Pi‐I D. Lin United States
Tanya L. Alderete United States
Guodong Ding China
Anne‐Sophie Morisset Canada
Jillian Ashley‐Martin Canada
Mikel Basterrechea Spain
Stephanie M. Eick United States
Hein Stigum Norway
Emily Baker relative to Shohreh F. Farzan United States Shohreh F. Farzan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Shohreh F. Farzan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Baker. The network helps show where Emily Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Baker Line = papers co-authored together Emily Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011285
2 2016106
3 201593
4 201660
5 201857
6 199656
7 201956
8 201554
9 201651
10 201950
11 202146
12 201445
13 201945
14 201539
15
Risks associated with pregnancy in spinal cord-injured women.
199239
16 202037
17 202136
18 201529
19 202128
20 201928

About Emily Baker

Emily Baker is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (18 papers), Arsenic contamination and mitigation (10 papers), Gut microbiota and health (10 papers), Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (7 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (6 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (5 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers) and Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (812 citations), Environmental Chemistry (461 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (175 citations), Pollution (201 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (230 citations). Emily Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Margaret R. Karagas, Diane Gilbert‐Diamond, Brian P. Jackson, Susan Korrick, Tracy Punshon, Diana D. Cardenas, Zhigang Li, Juliette C. Madan, Jennifer A. Emond and Kathryn L. Cottingham. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Research, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, Environmental Health Perspectives, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Environment International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact