Émilie Devijver

441 citations
21 papers · 216 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Émilie Devijver

20 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

Émilie Devijver
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Artificial Intelligence 94
  • Statistics and Probability 23
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 2
  • Signal Processing 20
  • Materials Chemistry 72
Replace Amos Waterland with:
Amos Waterland United States
Guillaume Verdon Canada
Kanta Naito Japan
Danuta Rutkowska Poland
Priyanka Das India
Khoa Lê United Kingdom
Chengtao Li China
A. Ustyuzhanin Russia
Chaim Goodman-Strauss United States
Pierre-Luc Dallaire-Demers Germany
Émilie Devijver relative to Amos Waterland United States Amos Waterland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.3×
Amos Waterland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Émilie Devijver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Émilie Devijver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Émilie Devijver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Émilie Devijver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Émilie Devijver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Émilie Devijver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Émilie Devijver. The network helps show where Émilie Devijver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Émilie Devijver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Émilie Devijver Line = papers co-authored together Émilie Devijver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202251
2 202220
3 202019
4 202416
5 201516
6 202213
7 202113
8 201613
9 202210
10 20199
11 20237
12 20227
13 20196
14 20236
15 20154
16 20222
17 20211
18 20241
19 20171
20 20231

About Émilie Devijver

Émilie Devijver is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, Materials Chemistry and Signal Processing, having authored 21 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (7 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (5 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (4 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (4 papers), Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research (3 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (3 papers), Machine Learning and Data Classification (3 papers) and Data Management and Algorithms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (94 citations), Statistics and Probability (23 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (2 citations), Signal Processing (20 citations) and Materials Chemistry (72 citations). Émilie Devijver has collaborated with scholars based in France, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Éric Gaussier, N. Jakse, Massih-Reza Amini, Roberta Poloni, Yannig Goude, Jean‐Michel Poggi, João Paulo Almeida de Mendonça, Jürgen Horbach, Philippe Jarry and Andreas Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Electronic Journal of Statistics, Scientific Reports, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Multivariate Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact