Émilie Devic

14 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers

Émilie Devic
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Insect Science 511
  • Social Psychology 306
  • Biochemistry 69
  • Aquatic Science 86
  • Marketing 70
Replace Doris Rittenschober with:
Doris Rittenschober Italy
Maharach Matra Thailand
Norhidayah Mohd Taufek Malaysia
Shaharudin Abdul Razak Malaysia
Sanaz Khosravi South Korea
Inês Guerreiro Portugal
E. A. Fasakin Nigeria
Femi J. Fawole Nigeria
Sónia Pedro Portugal
Alejandro Jiménez‐Gómez Spain
Émilie Devic relative to Doris Rittenschober Italy Doris Rittenschober's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Doris Rittenschober · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Émilie Devic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Émilie Devic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Émilie Devic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Émilie Devic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Émilie Devic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Émilie Devic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Émilie Devic. The network helps show where Émilie Devic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Émilie Devic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Émilie Devic Line = papers co-authored together Émilie Devic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2015178
2 2017144
3 200963
4 201459
5 200955
6 201054
7
Technical handbook of domestication and production of Diptera Black Soldier Fly (BSF), Hermetia illucens, Stratiomyidae
201454
8 201835
9 201727
10 201924
11 201516
12
Apparent digestibility coefficient of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae in formulated diets for hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂).
20199
13 20204
14
Modeling the substitution of fishmeal by maggot-meal in Tilapia feeds - case of a commercial production farm in West Africa
20133

About Émilie Devic

Émilie Devic is a scholar working on Insect Science, Social Psychology, Genetics, Marketing and Aquatic Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (11 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (9 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (2 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (2 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (511 citations), Social Psychology (306 citations), Biochemistry (69 citations), Aquatic Science (86 citations) and Marketing (70 citations). Émilie Devic has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Mali. Frequent co-authors include William Leschen, David C. Little, Francis J. Murray, Jean-Dominique Daudin, Sylvain Guyot, Catherine Bonazzi, Marc Kenis, N’golo Abdoulaye Koné, M. Wakefield and Elaine Fitches. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, Aquaculture Nutrition, Journal of Cleaner Production and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact