Emanuela Amici

733 citations
17 papers · 510 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Emanuela Amici

17 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Emanuela Amici
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 319
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 293
  • Urology 94
  • Pharmacology 69
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 77
Replace Karin Helsberg with:
Karin Helsberg Germany
P. Eric Konicki United States
Sandrine Compagnie France
Dafna Frydman Israel
Silvia Donati Italy
Öner Odabaş Türkiye
Robert B. Moreland United States
Ping‐Song Chou Taiwan
Takao Takamura Japan
A Scheen Belgium
Emanuela Amici relative to Karin Helsberg Germany Karin Helsberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Karin Helsberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emanuela Amici

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuela Amici's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuela Amici with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuela Amici more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuela Amici

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuela Amici. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuela Amici. The network helps show where Emanuela Amici may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emanuela Amici, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emanuela Amici Line = papers co-authored together Emanuela Amici links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2004241
2 200243
3 201840
4 200235
5 200534
6 200531
7 200526
8 202018
9 202114
10 20236
11 20065
12 20215
13 20214
14 20233
15
[The diameter of the common trunk of the left coronary artery and left ventricular mass in athletes. An echocardiographic study].
19903
16 20241
17 20251

About Emanuela Amici

Emanuela Amici is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (319 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (293 citations), Urology (94 citations), Pharmacology (69 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (77 citations). Emanuela Amici has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carmine Gazzaruso, Adriana Garzaniti, Pietro Fratino, Stefano Giordanetti, Diego Geroldi, Colomba Falcone, Sebastiano Bruno Solerte, Gianandrea Bertone, Arturo Pujia and Sergio De Filippis. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Current Neuropharmacology, International Journal of Cardiology, Circulation and International Journal of Impotence Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact