E.M.A. Smets

3.9k citations
5 papers · 3.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

E.M.A. Smets

5 papers receiving 3.0k citations

E.M.A. Smets's Hit Papers

The multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue 1995 · 2.9k citations
2.9k0+10+20Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k2.5k

Peers

E.M.A. Smets
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 875
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 312
  • Oncology 503
  • Neurology 199
  • Rehabilitation 87
Replace Louise Watts with:
Louise Watts United Kingdom
Geert Aufdemkampe Netherlands
Li‐Yung Lui United States
Paul G. Ritvo Canada
Christopher Christodoulou United States
Arthur Peck United States
Dona E.C. Locke United States
Fernando Dimeo Germany
Hitoshi Okamura Japan
Fiona Cramp United Kingdom
E.M.A. Smets relative to Louise Watts United Kingdom Louise Watts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Louise Watts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.M.A. Smets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.M.A. Smets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.M.A. Smets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.M.A. Smets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.M.A. Smets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.M.A. Smets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.M.A. Smets. The network helps show where E.M.A. Smets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside E.M.A. Smets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.M.A. Smets Line = papers co-authored together E.M.A. Smets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1
The multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue
Hit paper breakdown →
19952879
2
'Verkorte vermoeidheidsvragenlijst': een practisch hulpmiddel bij het scoren van vermoeidheid
199779
3
['Abbreviated fatigue questionnaire': a practical tool in the classification of fatigue].
199778
4 199845
5 19947

About E.M.A. Smets

E.M.A. Smets is a scholar working on Oncology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology, Pharmacology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 5 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (875 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (312 citations), Oncology (503 citations), Neurology (199 citations) and Rehabilitation (87 citations). E.M.A. Smets has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bert Garssen, J.C.J.M. de Haes, B. Bonke, Mark J. Alberts, Gijs Bleijenberg, Jan H. Vercoulen, Marja Visser, Paul Oosterveld and Nico H. Frijda. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Rehabilitation Oncology, Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact