E.M. Cashell

486 citations
14 papers · 425 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
    • Polymer crystallization and properties
    • Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications

Papers in

E.M. Cashell

14 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

E.M. Cashell
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Polymers and Plastics 179
  • Spectroscopy 164
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 101
  • Biophysics 35
  • Materials Chemistry 135
Replace H. Hakemi with:
H. Hakemi United States
Jean-François Châteaux France
Eugen Maier Austria
Tomomi Masui Japan
Stephen C. Weibel United States
Pouya Partovi‐Azar Germany
Hideo Takano Japan
W. Groh Germany
Serge Santos Switzerland
Siddharth Maheshwari India
E.M. Cashell relative to H. Hakemi United States H. Hakemi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
H. Hakemi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.M. Cashell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.M. Cashell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.M. Cashell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.M. Cashell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.M. Cashell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.M. Cashell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.M. Cashell. The network helps show where E.M. Cashell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside E.M. Cashell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.M. Cashell Line = papers co-authored together E.M. Cashell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1976167
2 198052
3 198248
4 197728
5 198220
6 198119
7 197718
8 198116
9 198215
10 198113
11 199111
12 198110
13 19787
14 19891

About E.M. Cashell

E.M. Cashell is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Polymers and Plastics, Molecular Biology, Mechanical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (5 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (3 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (2 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (2 papers) and Hemoglobin structure and function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (179 citations), Spectroscopy (164 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (101 citations), Biophysics (35 citations) and Materials Chemistry (135 citations). E.M. Cashell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and France. Frequent co-authors include Vincent J. McBrierty, E.R. Andrew, David Bryant, John Eustice O’Brien, Qingkai Meng, Rezsö Gáspár, R. Gáspár, D. C. Douglass, B. A. Dunell and John E. O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Physics Letters, Macromolecules, Physics Letters A, Polymer and Polymer Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact