Ellen Pollak

521 citations
14 papers · 235 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Historical and Literary Analyses
    • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment

Papers in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 11
    • American and British Literature Analysis 9
    • Historical and Literary Analyses 4
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 3
    • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics 3
    • Narrative Theory and Analysis 1
    • Early Modern Women Writers 2

Ellen Pollak

9 papers receiving 75 citations

Peers

Ellen Pollak
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Literature and Literary Theory 178
  • Religious studies 22
  • History 40
  • Gender Studies 24
  • Cultural Studies 19
Replace Cheryl Walker with:
Cheryl Walker United States
Wai-Chee Dimock United States
Betty A. Schellenberg Canada
Jan Fergus United States
Jennie Batchelor United Kingdom
Paula R. Feldman United States
Mary Jean Corbett United States
Leonée Ormond United Kingdom
Gail Ching-Liang Low United Kingdom
Frederick M. Keener United States
Ellen Pollak relative to Cheryl Walker United States Cheryl Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Cheryl Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Pollak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Pollak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Pollak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Pollak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Pollak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Pollak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Pollak. The network helps show where Ellen Pollak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Pollak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen Pollak Line = papers co-authored together Ellen Pollak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1987127
2 198641
3 199324
4 200317
5 200412
6 19865
7 19783
8 19883
9 19811
10 19841
11 20061
12 19890
13 19990
14 20090

About Ellen Pollak

Ellen Pollak is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Religious studies, Classics, Gender Studies and History, having authored 14 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (11 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (9 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (4 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (3 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (2 papers), Gender and Feminist Studies (1 paper) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (178 citations), Religious studies (22 citations), History (40 citations), Gender Studies (24 citations) and Cultural Studies (19 citations). Frequent co-authors include Mary Poovey, Ros Ballaster and Felicity A. Nussbaum. Their work appears in journals such as Eighteenth-Century Studies, Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, Signs, Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature and Modern Language Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact