Ellen D. McPhail

104 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Ellen D. McPhail
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Genetics 508
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 721
  • Nephrology 216
  • Oncology 438
  • Neurology 207
Replace Andrew Arnold with:
Andrew Arnold United States
Julie A. Vrana United States
Sophie Giraud France
Frederik J. Hes Netherlands
Yusri Elsayed United States
Alfonso Zaccaria Italy
Thomas Melchardt Austria
Anja Mottok Germany
Stefano Pizzolitto Italy
Nicola Di Renzo Italy
Ellen D. McPhail relative to Andrew Arnold United States Andrew Arnold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33.5×
Andrew Arnold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen D. McPhail

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen D. McPhail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen D. McPhail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen D. McPhail more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen D. McPhail

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen D. McPhail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen D. McPhail. The network helps show where Ellen D. McPhail may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen D. McPhail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen D. McPhail Line = papers co-authored together Ellen D. McPhail links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 115 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020170
2 2015156
3 2020132
4 2009118
5 201588
6 201172
7 201954
8 201651
9 201351
10 202449
11 201548
12 201847
13 201046
14 200946
15 201241
16 201237
17 202029
18 202128
19 201827
20 202026

About Ellen D. McPhail

Ellen D. McPhail is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Oncology and Nephrology, having authored 115 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (52 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (43 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (28 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (11 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (9 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (7 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers) and Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (508 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (721 citations), Nephrology (216 citations), Oncology (438 citations) and Neurology (207 citations). Ellen D. McPhail has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Kurtin, Angela Dispenzieri, Surendra Dasari, Morie A. Gertz, William G. Morice, Jason D. Theis, Martha Grogan, Curtis A. Hanson, Thomas E. Witzig and Rhett P. Ketterling. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Amyloid, Human Pathology, Kidney International and American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact