Elizabeth DeVos

493 citations
28 papers · 287 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Elizabeth DeVos

24 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Elizabeth DeVos
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Emergency Medicine 39
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 20
  • Nephrology 15
  • Epidemiology 66
  • Family Practice 3
Replace Taeyoung Kong with:
Taeyoung Kong South Korea
Viviane Cordeiro Veiga Brazil
Lin M. Riccio United States
Paloma F Cariello United States
Carlos del Pozo Vegas Spain
John Asger Petersen Denmark
Mihir R. Atreya United States
Avantika Chenna United States
Josey Hensley United States
Elizabeth DeVos relative to Taeyoung Kong South Korea Taeyoung Kong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Taeyoung Kong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth DeVos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth DeVos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth DeVos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth DeVos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth DeVos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth DeVos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth DeVos. The network helps show where Elizabeth DeVos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth DeVos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elizabeth DeVos Line = papers co-authored together Elizabeth DeVos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201549
2 202133
3 201829
4 201722
5 201520
6 202219
7 201518
8 200618
9 202311
10 202110
11 20209
12 20138
13 20238
14 20237
15 20245
16 20125
17
Updates and controversies in the early management of sepsis and septic shock.
20215
18 20253
19 20212
20 20202

About Elizabeth DeVos

Elizabeth DeVos is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medical Services and General Health Professions, having authored 28 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Global Health and Surgery (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper) and Ethics in medical practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (39 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (20 citations), Nephrology (15 citations), Epidemiology (66 citations) and Family Practice (3 citations). Elizabeth DeVos has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ethiopia and Rwanda. Frequent co-authors include Faheem W. Guirgis, Lisa A. Jacobson, Lauren Page Black, Carmen Smotherman, Frederick A. Moore, Henry Epino, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh, Michael A. Puskarich, Eshetie Melese Birru and Morgan Henson. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Annals of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America and Academic Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact