Elena Cano
Impact in
- Biophysics top 5%
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Papers in
-
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 7
- Congenital heart defects research 7
- Renal and related cancers 4
- Surgery 9
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 3
- Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Rita Carmona (14 shared papers)Ramón Muñoz‐Chápuli (14 shared papers)Viesturs Simanis (8 shared papers)Andrea Krapp (6 shared papers)Susanne Schmidt (2 shared papers)Tristan Colomb (1 shared paper)Pierre J. Magistretti (1 shared paper)Jonas Kühn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (2 papers)Current Biology (2 papers)FEBS Letters (2 papers)Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (2 papers)Drug Metabolism and Disposition (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SpainGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Elena Cano
28 papers receiving 948 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Biophysics 101
- Cell Biology 213
- Molecular Biology 559
- Media Technology 57
- Surgery 208
Countries citing papers authored by Elena Cano
This map shows the geographic impact of Elena Cano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elena Cano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elena Cano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elena Cano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elena Cano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elena Cano. The network helps show where Elena Cano may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elena Cano, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 160 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 93 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 90 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 89 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 12 |
About Elena Cano
Elena Cano is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Cell Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 970 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (7 papers), Congenital heart defects research (7 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (6 papers), Renal and related cancers (4 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (3 papers), Coronary Artery Anomalies (3 papers) and Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (101 citations), Cell Biology (213 citations), Molecular Biology (559 citations), Media Technology (57 citations) and Surgery (208 citations). Elena Cano has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Rita Carmona, Ramón Muñoz‐Chápuli, Viesturs Simanis, Andrea Krapp, Susanne Schmidt, Tristan Colomb, Pierre J. Magistretti, Jonas Kühn, Benjamin Rappaz and Pierre Marquet. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Current Biology, FEBS Letters, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Drug Metabolism and Disposition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.