Eleanor Howgate

536 citations
10 papers · 426 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Eleanor Howgate

10 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Eleanor Howgate
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Pharmacology 229
  • Statistics and Probability 40
  • Oncology 115
  • Pharmaceutical Science 26
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 66
Replace B Booth with:
B Booth United States
Juri Solodenko Germany
Nam Atiqur Rahman United States
Jasleen K. Sodhi United States
Mikael S. Thomsen Denmark
K S Reynolds United States
John Dikran Balian United States
Manuela Grimstein United States
Graeme Young United Kingdom
Howard Burt United Kingdom
Eleanor Howgate relative to B Booth United States B Booth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
B Booth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eleanor Howgate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eleanor Howgate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eleanor Howgate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eleanor Howgate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eleanor Howgate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eleanor Howgate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eleanor Howgate. The network helps show where Eleanor Howgate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eleanor Howgate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eleanor Howgate Line = papers co-authored together Eleanor Howgate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2006190
2 200671
3 200665
4 201150
5 202314
6 201713
7 202311
8 20218
9 20242
10
Mechanistic Prediction of HIV Drug-Drug Interactions in Virtual Populations from in vitro Enzyme Kinetic Data: Ritonavir and Saquinavir
20072

About Eleanor Howgate

Eleanor Howgate is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 10 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (7 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (1 paper) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (229 citations), Statistics and Probability (40 citations), Oncology (115 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (26 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (66 citations). Eleanor Howgate has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Amin Rostami‐Hodjegan, Geoffrey T. Tucker, Karen Rowland Yeo, K Rowland‐Yeo, Zoe Barter, Mohammad Bagher Shiran, Hiroshi Yamazaki, Shinichi Inoue, Tsutomu Shimada and Trevor N. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Xenobiotica, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Drug Metabolism and Disposition and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact