E.K. Piper

23 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

E.K. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Parasitology 370
  • Insect Science 139
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 205
  • Small Animals 61
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 81
Replace David Berthier with:
David Berthier France
Christine Maritz-Olivier South Africa
Stephen Mwaura Kenya
Silvina Elizabeth Wilkowsky Argentina
Isabelle Chantal France
Mario Valdés Cuba
Donald P. Knowles United States
Kozo Fujisaki Japan
J.F. Huntley United Kingdom
Kathryn Bartley United Kingdom
E.K. Piper relative to David Berthier France David Berthier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
David Berthier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.K. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.K. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.K. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.K. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.K. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.K. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.K. Piper. The network helps show where E.K. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.K. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.K. Piper Line = papers co-authored together E.K. Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200990
2 200968
3 200862
4 201360
5 201451
6 201048
7 201333
8 201325
9 201124
10
Integrated Control Programs for Ticks On Cattle
200722
11 201421
12 201618
13 200817
14 201215
15 20169
16 20188
17 20138
18
Meta-analysis of genome wide association and gene expression studies to identify candidate genes for tick burden in cattle
20106
19 20215
20 20215

About E.K. Piper

E.K. Piper is a scholar working on Parasitology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 24 papers that have together received 607 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (12 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (12 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (4 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Helminth infection and control (3 papers) and Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (370 citations), Insect Science (139 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (205 citations), Small Animals (61 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (81 citations). E.K. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include N.N. Jonsson, Louise A. Jackson, Ala E. Tabor, Constantin Constantinoiu, Cedric Gondro, Paula Moolhuijzen, Sean W. Corley, Neil H. Bagnall, Ala E. Lew and Jennifer M. Seddon. Their work appears in journals such as Parasite Immunology, International Journal for Parasitology, Animal Genetics, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology and Research in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact