Clinical and Vaccine Immunology

3.6k papers and 109.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology in the last decades have received a total of 109.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology usually cover Epidemiology (1.6k papers), Infectious Diseases (1.4k papers) and Immunology (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (366 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (328 papers) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (324 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology are Stanley A. Plotkin, Gabriela Perdigón, Ray Borrow, Moon H. Nahm, Harry E. Prince, Carolina Maldonado Galdeano, Bruce D. Meade, Freyja Lynn, Christopher R. Thornton and Shyam Sundar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical and Vaccine Immunology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025