Eiko Shimojo

1.1k citations
12 papers · 707 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Eiko Shimojo

11 papers receiving 682 citations

Eiko Shimojo's Hit Papers

Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference 2003 · 606 citations
6060+7+15Years since publication200400600

Peers

Eiko Shimojo
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • General Decision Sciences 133
  • Sensory Systems 124
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 434
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 230
  • Human-Computer Interaction 58
Replace C. Simion with:
C. Simion United States
Mackenzie G. Glaholt Canada
Tedra A. Fazendeiro United States
L. Elizabeth Crawford United States
Laura K. M. Graf Germany
Guanxiong Pei China
Karen Collins Canada
Paul E. Stillman United States
Volker Thoma United Kingdom
Kevin J. Hawley United States
Eiko Shimojo relative to C. Simion United States C. Simion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C. Simion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eiko Shimojo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eiko Shimojo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eiko Shimojo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eiko Shimojo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eiko Shimojo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eiko Shimojo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eiko Shimojo. The network helps show where Eiko Shimojo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Eiko Shimojo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eiko Shimojo Line = papers co-authored together Eiko Shimojo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference
Hit paper breakdown →
2003606
2 200986
3 20113
4 20132
5 20102
6 20152
7 20102
8 20101
9 20111
10 20101
11 20101
12 20100

About Eiko Shimojo

Eiko Shimojo is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sensory Systems and Clinical Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 707 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (9 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (1 paper) and Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (133 citations), Sensory Systems (124 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (434 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (230 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (58 citations). Eiko Shimojo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shinsuke Shimojo, Christian Scheier, C. Simion, Daw‐An Wu, Daniela Mier, Connie Wang, Makio Kashino, Lauren LeBon, Stephan Schleim and Junichi Ishizaki. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact