E.F. Wassermann

1.4k citations
76 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

E.F. Wassermann

75 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

E.F. Wassermann
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Condensed Matter Physics 357
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 542
  • General Materials Science 47
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 442
  • Materials Chemistry 594
Replace W. Bührer with:
W. Bührer Switzerland
A. Chamberod France
S. H. Liou United States
A.E. Curzon Canada
V. V. Nemoshkalenko Ukraine
A J Pindor United Kingdom
B. Ginatempo Italy
W. B. Muir Canada
J. Teillet France
Masato Aoki Japan
E.F. Wassermann relative to W. Bührer Switzerland W. Bührer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
W. Bührer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.F. Wassermann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.F. Wassermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.F. Wassermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.F. Wassermann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.F. Wassermann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.F. Wassermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.F. Wassermann. The network helps show where E.F. Wassermann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.F. Wassermann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.F. Wassermann Line = papers co-authored together E.F. Wassermann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007151
2 198273
3 200562
4 198748
5 200747
6 198745
7 197041
8 200241
9 198237
10 199837
11 199830
12 200129
13 198828
14 199827
15 199827
16 199725
17 199920
18 198619
19 197119
20 200019

About E.F. Wassermann

E.F. Wassermann is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (24 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (22 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (21 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (15 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (11 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (10 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (10 papers) and Shape Memory Alloy Transformations (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (357 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (542 citations), General Materials Science (47 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (442 citations) and Materials Chemistry (594 citations). E.F. Wassermann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Acet, G. Dumpich, Bernd Rellinghaus, Antoni Planes, Lluı́s Mañosa, Thorsten Krenke, Xavier Moya, R. Marx, Seda Aksoy and Werner Pepperhoff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, The European Physical Journal B, Surface Science, Physica B Condensed Matter and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact