Edwin Herrera

578 citations
34 papers · 379 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin Herrera

30 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Edwin Herrera
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Condensed Matter Physics 276
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 180
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 203
  • Materials Chemistry 88
  • Structural Biology 1
Replace Josef Kaufmann with:
Josef Kaufmann Austria
Narayan Mohanta India
Guoxiang Zhi China
H. D. Rosales Argentina
E. Cappelli Switzerland
Yuqing Xing China
R. Grasset France
T. V. Bay Netherlands
Rodrigo Jaeschke‐Ubiergo Germany
Yanyan Shangguan China
Edwin Herrera relative to Josef Kaufmann Austria Josef Kaufmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
Josef Kaufmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Herrera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Herrera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Herrera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Herrera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Herrera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Herrera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Herrera. The network helps show where Edwin Herrera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Herrera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Herrera Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Herrera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201854
2 201549
3 201637
4 201633
5 201527
6 201522
7 202119
8 202318
9 201816
10
Observation of a gel of quantum vortices in a superconductor at very low magnetic fields
202015
11 201814
12 202312
13 202210
14 20238
15 20228
16 20176
17 20176
18 20244
19 20164
20 20203

About Edwin Herrera

Edwin Herrera is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 34 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (19 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (16 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (8 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (8 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (7 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (7 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (5 papers) and Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (276 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (180 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (203 citations), Materials Chemistry (88 citations) and Structural Biology (1 citation). Edwin Herrera has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Hermann Suderow, Isabel Guillamón, J. A. Galvis, S. Vieǐra, M. Garcı́a-Hernández, José Ignacio Pascual, F. J. Mompeán, Deung-Jang Choi, Carmen Rubio-Verdú and Nicolás Lorente. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Physical Review Research, Physical Review Letters, Communications Physics and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact