Edwin E. Wagner

114 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

Edwin E. Wagner
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Applied Psychology 385
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 88
  • Clinical Psychology 147
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 16
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 74
Replace Julius Frankenbach with:
Julius Frankenbach Germany
Thomas Trese
Robert Kalas United States
Julian Meltzoff United States
Blain S. Walker United States
Hans Westmeyer Germany
Steven F. Bacon United States
Gualberto Buela Casal Spain
Mervin B. Freedman United States
Stephen T. DeMers United States
Edwin E. Wagner relative to Julius Frankenbach Germany Julius Frankenbach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Julius Frankenbach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin E. Wagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin E. Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin E. Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin E. Wagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin E. Wagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin E. Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin E. Wagner. The network helps show where Edwin E. Wagner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Edwin E. Wagner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin E. Wagner Line = papers co-authored together Edwin E. Wagner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 123 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986129
2 198133
3 197432
4 197123
5 196222
6 197818
7 198318
8 196316
9 196416
10 198316
11 199216
12 198614
13 196213
14 197613
15 196712
16 196111
17 199211
18 197810
19 197810
20 198910

About Edwin E. Wagner

Edwin E. Wagner is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 123 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (97 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (15 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (8 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Career Development and Diversity (3 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (385 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (88 citations), Clinical Psychology (147 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (16 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (74 citations). Edwin E. Wagner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul E. Panek, Ralph A. Alexander, Zygmunt A. Piotrowski, Barry Bricklin, Patrick W. Maloney, Harvey L. Sterns, Bruce J. Avolio, John F. Binning, John F. Copper and Faye H. Dambrot. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality Assessment, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Educational and Psychological Measurement, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact