Edwin E. Moïse

2.1k citations
59 papers · 1.2k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin E. Moïse

49 papers receiving 810 citations

Peers

Edwin E. Moïse
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Geometry and Topology 576
  • Theoretical Computer Science 43
  • Mathematical Physics 155
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 49
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 31
Replace Karl Menger with:
Karl Menger United States
Lynn Arthur Steen United States
Hubert Brian Griffiths United Kingdom
Marston Morse United States
Robert F. Brown United States
Howard W. Eves United States
John Ewing United States
Burton Rodin United States
Frank A. Farris United States
Carl B. Boyer United States
Edwin E. Moïse relative to Karl Menger United States Karl Menger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Karl Menger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin E. Moïse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin E. Moïse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin E. Moïse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin E. Moïse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin E. Moïse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin E. Moïse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin E. Moïse. The network helps show where Edwin E. Moïse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Edwin E. Moïse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin E. Moïse Line = papers co-authored together Edwin E. Moïse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977300
2 1952249
3 1982139
4
Elementary Geometry from an Advanced Standpoint
196361
5 195459
6 196533
7 195231
8 195227
9 199825
10 195319
11 197518
12 198416
13 196515
14 197613
15
Modern China, A History
198613
16 197512
17 198712
18 197711
19 198210
20 198410

About Edwin E. Moïse

Edwin E. Moïse is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Political Science and International Relations, Theoretical Computer Science and History, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (20 papers), Military History and Strategy (11 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (8 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (7 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (6 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (6 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (4 papers) and Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (576 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (43 citations), Mathematical Physics (155 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (49 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (31 citations). Edwin E. Moïse has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gary R. Hess, Alexander Woodside, Fredrik Logevall, Carl C. Cowen, John Prados, Vivienne B. Shue and Andrew J. Bacevich. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Mathematics, Pacific Affairs, The American Historical Review, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and The Journal of Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact