Edwin E. Moïse

47 papers receiving 791 citations

Peers

Edwin E. Moïse
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Geometry and Topology 489
  • Theoretical Computer Science 55
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 151
  • Mathematical Physics 340
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 73
Replace Karl Menger with:
Karl Menger United States
Robert F. Brown United States
Frank Quinn United States
Howard Eves United States
Félix Klein Germany
H. B. Griffiths United Kingdom
Marston Morse United States
Gerald L. Alexanderson United States
Detlef Laugwitz Germany
Leonhard Euler Germany
Edwin E. Moïse relative to Karl Menger United States Karl Menger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Karl Menger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin E. Moïse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin E. Moïse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin E. Moïse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin E. Moïse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin E. Moïse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin E. Moïse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin E. Moïse. The network helps show where Edwin E. Moïse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Edwin E. Moïse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin E. Moïse Line = papers co-authored together Edwin E. Moïse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977283
2 1952240
3 1982145
4
Elementary Geometry from an Advanced Standpoint
196361
5 195460
6 196533
7 195231
8 195229
9 199826
10 195320
11 198419
12 197518
13 196517
14 197616
15
Modern China, A History
198614
16 197512
17 198712
18 197711
19 198410
20 198210

About Edwin E. Moïse

Edwin E. Moïse is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Sociology and Political Science, Mathematical Physics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (14 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (13 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (10 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (8 papers), Mathematics and Applications (8 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (6 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (489 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (55 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (151 citations), Mathematical Physics (340 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (73 citations). Edwin E. Moïse has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Gary R. Hess, Alexander Woodside, Fredrik Logevall, Carl C. Cowen, John Prados, Vivienne Shue, Mark Lawrence and Andrew J. Bacevich. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Mathematics, Pacific Affairs, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, The American Historical Review and The Journal of Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact