Edwin Ding

807 citations
26 papers · 619 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin Ding

25 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

Edwin Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 347
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 428
  • Modeling and Simulation 47
  • Mathematical Physics 43
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 249
Replace Muhammad Tahir with:
Muhammad Tahir Pakistan
J. Y. Zhu China
Karim K. Ahmed Egypt
Mibaile Justin Cameroon
K. Manikandan India
Ahmad Javid Pakistan
Cheng Yi China
Naila Nasreen China
Zhi‐Zeng Si China
Da-Wei Zuo China
Edwin Ding relative to Muhammad Tahir Pakistan Muhammad Tahir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×39×
Muhammad Tahir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Ding. The network helps show where Edwin Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Ding Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005100
2 201488
3 201181
4 200957
5 201145
6 201643
7 201138
8 201627
9 201125
10 201220
11 201117
12 201216
13 201016
14 200910
15 19958
16 20116
17 20116
18 20145
19 20114
20 20172

About Edwin Ding

Edwin Ding is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computer Networks and Communications and Mathematical Physics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (22 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (12 papers), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (12 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (11 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (6 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (4 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (2 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (347 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (428 citations), Modeling and Simulation (47 citations), Mathematical Physics (43 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (249 citations). Edwin Ding has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Israel. Frequent co-authors include J. Nathan Kutz, K. W. Chow, R. Grimshaw, Philippe Grelu, Eli Shlizerman, Hiu Ning Chan, David Jacob Kedziora, Roger Grimshaw, Stéphane Lefrançois and Matthew O. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Optical Society of America B, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Physical Review A, Optics Letters and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact