Edward Roufail
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Otorhinolaryngology top 10%
- Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Papers in
-
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 4
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
- Nerve injury and regeneration 1
- Co-authors
- Sandra Rees (6 shared papers)Penelope J. Allen (4 shared papers)Daniel Chiu (3 shared papers)Paul Connell (2 shared papers)William Campbell (2 shared papers)Ben Clark (2 shared papers)Amirul Islam (2 shared papers)Robert Buttery (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Edward Roufail
12 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Ophthalmology 265
- Otorhinolaryngology 25
- Clinical Biochemistry 34
- Microbiology 2
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 48
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Roufail
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Roufail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Roufail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Roufail more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Roufail
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Roufail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Roufail. The network helps show where Edward Roufail may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward Roufail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 182 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 22 | |
| 7 | Chronic hypoxemia: effects on developing nitrergic and dopaminergic amacrine cells. | 1999 | 15 |
| 8 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 1 |
About Edward Roufail
Edward Roufail is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Physiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (265 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (25 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (34 citations), Microbiology (2 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (48 citations). Edward Roufail has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Rees, Penelope J. Allen, Daniel Chiu, Paul Connell, William Campbell, Ben Clark, Amirul Islam, Robert Buttery, Evelyn C. O’Neill and Mark McCombe. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Brain Research, Diabetologia and Retina.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.