Kemp Malone

2.3k citations
42 papers · 724 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Kemp Malone

29 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Kemp Malone
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Linguistics and Language 142
  • Language and Linguistics 238
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 266
  • Classics 82
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 163
Replace John DeFrancis with:
John DeFrancis United States
Archibald A. Hill United States
Peter Mackridge United Kingdom
Bruce A. Beatie United States
Georges Mounin France
Yakov Malkiel United States
I. J. Gelb
Kees Versteegh Netherlands
Gilbert Lazard France
Angus McIntosh United Kingdom
Kemp Malone relative to John DeFrancis United States John DeFrancis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
John DeFrancis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kemp Malone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kemp Malone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kemp Malone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kemp Malone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kemp Malone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kemp Malone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kemp Malone. The network helps show where Kemp Malone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Kemp Malone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kemp Malone Line = papers co-authored together Kemp Malone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1953296
2 1954262
3 195336
4 195121
5 195615
6 196215
7 195912
8 195610
9 195110
10
The Nowell codex : British Museum Cotton Vitellius A. XV, second ms.
19634
11 19534
12 19623
13 19522
14
The literary history of Hamlet : the early tradition
19642
15 19542
16 19602
17 19582
18 19542
19 19652
20 19642

About Kemp Malone

Kemp Malone is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Classics, History, Literature and Literary Theory and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (8 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (7 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers), Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers) and Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (142 citations), Language and Linguistics (238 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (266 citations), Classics (82 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (163 citations). Kemp Malone has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Werner F. Léopold, I. J. Gelb, John S. P. Tatlock, J. R. Hulbert, David Diringer, John C. Pope, Albert C. Baugh, Paul Baum, R. M. Wilson and Richard Beck. Their work appears in journals such as Language, Speculum, The Modern Language Review, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America and The American Journal of Philology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact