Kemp Malone

2.3k citations
42 papers · 604 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Kemp Malone

30 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Kemp Malone
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Linguistics and Language 127
  • Classics 74
  • Language and Linguistics 197
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 221
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 119
Replace Angus McIntosh with:
Angus McIntosh United Kingdom
Herbert Penzl United States
Peter Mackridge United Kingdom
Bruce A. Beatie United States
Nigel Fabb United Kingdom
Pierre Swiggers Belgium
Barbara M. H. Strang United Kingdom
Krystyna Pomorska Poland
M. H. Short Algeria
Harald Weinrich Germany
Kemp Malone relative to Angus McIntosh United Kingdom Angus McIntosh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Angus McIntosh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kemp Malone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kemp Malone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kemp Malone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kemp Malone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kemp Malone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kemp Malone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kemp Malone. The network helps show where Kemp Malone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Kemp Malone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kemp Malone Line = papers co-authored together Kemp Malone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1953246
2 1954205
3 195328
4 195121
5 196215
6 195614
7 195911
8 195610
9 19517
10
The Nowell codex : British Museum Cotton Vitellius A. XV, second ms.
19634
11 19534
12 19623
13
The literary history of Hamlet : the early tradition
19642
14 19522
15 19542
16 19602
17 19582
18 19642
19 19602
20 19542

About Kemp Malone

Kemp Malone is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Classics, History, Social Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 42 papers that have together received 604 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (8 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (7 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 papers), Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers) and Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (127 citations), Classics (74 citations), Language and Linguistics (197 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (221 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (119 citations). Kemp Malone has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Werner F. Léopold, I. J. Gelb, John S. P. Tatlock, Sherman M. Kuhn, Hans Kurath, J. R. Hulbert, David Diringer, Helge Kökeritz, Stefán Einarsson and Albert C. Baugh. Their work appears in journals such as Language, The Modern Language Review, Speculum, The American Journal of Philology and PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact