Edward E. Davis

1.3k citations
29 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Edward E. Davis

29 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Edward E. Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Insect Science 622
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 558
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 320
  • Genetics 332
  • Sensory Systems 53
Replace R. de Jong with:
R. de Jong Netherlands
Pablo G. Guerenstein Argentina
Yu Tong Qiu Netherlands
M. F. Bowen United States
Sharon R. Hill Sweden
Zainulabeuddin Syed United States
Romina B. Barrozo Argentina
Peter G. N. Njagi Kenya
John G. Stoffolano United States
Marcelo Gustavo Lorenzo Brazil
Edward E. Davis relative to R. de Jong Netherlands R. de Jong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
R. de Jong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward E. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward E. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward E. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward E. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward E. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward E. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward E. Davis. The network helps show where Edward E. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Edward E. Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward E. Davis Line = papers co-authored together Edward E. Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975141
2 1976137
3 198598
4 198495
5
Sensory physiological basis for attraction in mosquitoes.
199485
6 198483
7 198861
8 197650
9 197742
10 198033
11 198130
12 198230
13 197227
14 199227
15 198727
16 198820
17 197918
18 199417
19 198916
20 198516

About Edward E. Davis

Edward E. Davis is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (19 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (9 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (9 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers) and Dengue and Mosquito Control Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (622 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (558 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (320 citations), Genetics (332 citations) and Sensory Systems (53 citations). Edward E. Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Phillip G. Sokolove, M. F. Bowen, Charles S. Rebert, Michael D. Bentley, B. C. Syrett, Raj K. Gupta, Marc J. Klowden, W. G. Friend, Daniel E. Sonenshine and Keith A. Carson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Medical Entomology, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, International Journal of Psychophysiology and Medical and Veterinary Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact