Edward D. Smith

74 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Edward D. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Urology 310
  • Dermatology 165
  • Electrochemistry 101
  • Bioengineering 69
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 229
Replace Cheng‐Keng Chuang with:
Cheng‐Keng Chuang Taiwan
Kenneth James United Kingdom
Abdul Rahman Jazieh Saudi Arabia
Huiping Zhang China
Andrew L. Wong United States
B. Lundberg Sweden
Brad Rodu United States
Changying Chen China
Abdul‐Kader Souid United Arab Emirates
Michael C. Young United States
Edward D. Smith relative to Cheng‐Keng Chuang Taiwan Cheng‐Keng Chuang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.4×
Cheng‐Keng Chuang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward D. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward D. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward D. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward D. Smith. The network helps show where Edward D. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward D. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward D. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Edward D. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001141
2 1973107
3 200589
4 196689
5
Anorectal malformations in children: update 1988.
198880
6 197266
7 200159
8 198744
9
Spina bifida and the total care of spinal myelomeningocele
196543
10 196142
11 198240
12
Congenital anomalies of the urinary and genital tracts
199636
13 196833
14 197933
15 195933
16 197129
17
Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney, Urinary and Genital Tracts
200227
18 200126
19 195126
20 197219

About Edward D. Smith

Edward D. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Urology, Spectroscopy, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Organic Chemistry, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (14 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (14 papers), Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies (9 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (9 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (6 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (5 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (310 citations), Dermatology (165 citations), Electrochemistry (101 citations), Bioengineering (69 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (229 citations). Edward D. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include G.K. Smith, F. Douglas Stephens, Steven R. Feldman, James L. Wofford, David P. Miller, D. D. DeFord, Phillip M. Williford, Neal D. Goldman, Alan B. Fleischer and Thomas G. McCord. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Inorganic Chemistry, The Journal of Urology and Dermatologic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact