Edward D. Pingleton
Impact in
-
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment
- Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
- Surgery top 5%
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques 7
-
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment 3
- Co-authors
- Ralph Victor Clayman (8 shared papers)Frederick D. Roemer (8 shared papers)Louis Raphael Kavoussi (5 shared papers)Michael David Darcy (5 shared papers)Stephen M. Dierks (5 shared papers)Nathaniel J. Soper (4 shared papers)Shimon Meretyk (4 shared papers)Margaret Sue Pearle (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Urology (4 papers)New England Journal of Medicine (2 papers)Urology (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edward D. Pingleton
8 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Edward D. Pingleton's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 754
- Surgery 875
- Transplantation 35
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 62
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 69
Countries citing papers authored by Edward D. Pingleton
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward D. Pingleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward D. Pingleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward D. Pingleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward D. Pingleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward D. Pingleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward D. Pingleton. The network helps show where Edward D. Pingleton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Edward D. Pingleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Initial Case Report Hit paper breakdown → | 1991 | 1122 |
| 2 | 1991 | 207 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 131 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 8 | Laparoscopic pneumodissection: results in initial 20 patients. | 1997 | 4 |
About Edward D. Pingleton
Edward D. Pingleton is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (7 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (1 paper), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (1 paper) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (754 citations), Surgery (875 citations), Transplantation (35 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (62 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (69 citations). Edward D. Pingleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ralph Victor Clayman, Frederick D. Roemer, Louis Raphael Kavoussi, Michael David Darcy, Stephen M. Dierks, Nathaniel J. Soper, Shimon Meretyk, Margaret Sue Pearle, Elspeth M. McDougall and Stephen Y. Nakada. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, New England Journal of Medicine, Urology and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.