Edward Baum

16 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Edward Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 92
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 43
  • Cancer Research 31
  • Pharmacology 18
  • Organic Chemistry 52
Replace Mary Jo Kahley with:
Mary Jo Kahley Canada
Roger E. Schirmer United States
Prakash Chandra Joshi India
Susan Wollowitz United States
William D. Munslow United States
Neil Campbell United Kingdom
Marshall W. Cronyn United States
Toshiya Okajima Japan
Robert O. Kan United States
Duncan J. McLennan New Zealand
Edward Baum relative to Mary Jo Kahley Canada Mary Jo Kahley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.6×
Mary Jo Kahley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Baum. The network helps show where Edward Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Edward Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward Baum Line = papers co-authored together Edward Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 197870
2 196657
3 196529
4 201819
5 201318
6 196917
7 196513
8 197612
9 19668
10 19698
11 19884
12 19934
13 20184
14 19682
15
Creating a Blended Cooperative Learning Classroom
20132
16
THE IMPACT OF EMISSIONS FROM TRANSPORTATION SOURCES ON AIR QUALITY: ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL, FINAL REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
19761
17 20180

About Edward Baum

Edward Baum is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Spectroscopy and Water Science and Technology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (7 papers), Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (4 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (3 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (2 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (92 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (43 citations), Cancer Research (31 citations), Pharmacology (18 citations) and Organic Chemistry (52 citations). Edward Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include JAMES N. JUN. PITTS, J. K. S. Wan, Jeffrey R. Wyatt, Douglas F. Barofsky, Cyril Párkányi, L. D. Hess, Peter A. Leermakers, Edward A. Schuck, George F. Vesley and Richard L. Pitter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Analytica Chimica Acta, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems and Photochemistry and Photobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact