Edward Bailey
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Philosophy top 5%
- Media, Religion, Digital Communication
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Papers in
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 16
- Religion, Society, and Development 8
- Philosophy 11
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 7
- Media, Religion, Digital Communication 3
- Co-authors
- Lyndal Roper (1 shared paper)Ainslie T. Embree (1 shared paper)Kenneth W. Jones (1 shared paper)Leslie J. Francis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Implicit Religion (3 papers)Social Compass (2 papers)Review of Religious Research (2 papers)Religion (2 papers)Journal for the Study of Spirituality (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Edward Bailey
20 papers receiving 188 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Health 79
- Philosophy 62
- Geography, Planning and Development 29
- Sociology and Political Science 156
- Religious studies 17
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Bailey
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Bailey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Bailey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Bailey. The network helps show where Edward Bailey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Edward Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 43 | |
| 2 | Implicit religion in contemporary society | 1997 | 36 |
| 3 | 1990 | 28 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 27 | |
| 5 | The secular quest for meaning in life : Denton papers in implicit religion | 2002 | 24 |
| 6 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 17 | A workbook in popular religion | 1986 | 2 |
| 18 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 1 |
About Edward Bailey
Edward Bailey is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Health, Education and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 23 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (16 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (8 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (7 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (3 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (79 citations), Philosophy (62 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (29 citations), Sociology and Political Science (156 citations) and Religious studies (17 citations). Edward Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lyndal Roper, Ainslie T. Embree, Kenneth W. Jones and Leslie J. Francis. Their work appears in journals such as Implicit Religion, Social Compass, Review of Religious Research, Religion and Journal for the Study of Spirituality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.