Edna Schechtman

131 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Edna Schechtman
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
  • Reproductive Medicine 472
  • Statistics and Probability 439
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 351
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 247
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 271
Replace Peter W. Jones with:
Peter W. Jones United Kingdom
David Oakes United States
Daniel Zelterman United States
Mei‐Ling Ting Lee United States
P. A. Jacobs United States
Jie Chen China
Harald Binder Germany
Wei Pan United States
Daniel Schwartz United States
Werner Vach Germany
Edna Schechtman relative to Peter W. Jones United Kingdom Peter W. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Peter W. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edna Schechtman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edna Schechtman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna Schechtman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna Schechtman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edna Schechtman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna Schechtman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna Schechtman. The network helps show where Edna Schechtman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edna Schechtman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edna Schechtman Line = papers co-authored together Edna Schechtman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 135 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003356
2 2010291
3 2001201
4 2002159
5 1986153
6 2012146
7 1992119
8 2012111
9 200695
10 200387
11 200686
12 200681
13 200573
14 200171
15 198467
16 199961
17 200653
18 201250
19 200250
20 200950

About Edna Schechtman

Edna Schechtman is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 135 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (21 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (14 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (14 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (13 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (9 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (7 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (472 citations), Statistics and Probability (439 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (351 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (247 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (271 citations). Edna Schechtman has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Shlomo Yitzhaki, Rivka Inzelberg, David Shinar, Nava Dekel, Amihai Barash, Irit Granot, D. V. Hinkley, Richard Compton, Tamar Flash and Sheila Fieldust. Their work appears in journals such as Accident Analysis & Prevention, Biometrika, Neurology, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact