Edna Schechtman

125 papers receiving 4k citations

Peers

Edna Schechtman
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Statistics and Probability 456
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 291
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 341
  • Reproductive Medicine 331
  • Neurology 445
Replace Scott I. Vrieze with:
Scott I. Vrieze United States
David Oakes United States
Wei Pan United States
Tomasz Burzykowski Belgium
Dimitris Rizopoulos Netherlands
Daniel A. Zelterman United States
Yoshimitsu Fukushima Japan
Sharon F. Terry United States
M. Dawn Teare United Kingdom
Ute Hamann Germany
Edna Schechtman relative to Scott I. Vrieze United States Scott I. Vrieze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.8×
Scott I. Vrieze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edna Schechtman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edna Schechtman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna Schechtman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna Schechtman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edna Schechtman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna Schechtman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna Schechtman. The network helps show where Edna Schechtman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edna Schechtman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edna Schechtman Line = papers co-authored together Edna Schechtman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003390
2 2010315
3 2001201
4 2002177
5 1986163
6 2012159
7 1992123
8 1987118
9 2003111
10 2006100
11 201291
12 200689
13 198478
14 200178
15 200577
16 200676
17 200659
18 201259
19 198758
20 199655

About Edna Schechtman

Edna Schechtman is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Neurology and Finance, having authored 125 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic and Road Safety (16 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (15 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (13 papers), Probability and Statistical Research (13 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (12 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (12 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (7 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (456 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (291 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (341 citations), Reproductive Medicine (331 citations) and Neurology (445 citations). Edna Schechtman has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Shlomo Yitzhaki, Rivka Inzelberg, David Shinar, Nava Dekel, Irit Granot, Amihai Barash, DAVID V. HINKLEY, Richard Compton, Tamar Flash and Sheila Fieldust. Their work appears in journals such as Accident Analysis & Prevention, Neurology, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact